Management and Organization in Global Environment Taylorism

Question: Write about theManagement and Organization in Global Environment for Taylorism. Answer: Ford and Taylorism The concept of Ford and Taylorism has rendered a business revolution 100 years ago. Ford Automobile in order to establish their business in the market had to face innumerable difficulties. The productivity of the organization had been decreased rapidly. After the entrance of Frendrick WinslowTaylor in the business process of Ford, the situation became change. The general concept of Taylorism in rendering the success of business was hard work and unity. Employees should cooperate with each other in order to perform well towards the success of business. This particular concept was however rendered 100 years ago. As per the general concept of the employees of Australia, America and Europe only employee co-operation and hard work is not sufficient to reach the peak of success for a business organization. In order to survive amidst the competitive market threat business organizations of today have to follow effective marketing and promotional strategy as well as organizational strategy and policy. Boyer, R. and Durand (2016) has differed the point of view of previous concept. This particular scholar has mentioned that before making a proper organizational strategy and policy employees have to maintain a participative co-operation. Therefore, the role of Taylorism would never be demolished in the development of business organizations even after 100 years. The success of business process in a call centre is highly dependent on the interpersonal communication among the employees. Employees would be able to fulfill the needs and demands of the customers only when they would exchange necessary information with each other. In this kind of situation employee co-operation, effective interpersonal communication, participative relation between the employees and the managers are highly important for providing productive works. Therefore, call centers need to follow Taylorism while running their entire process of business. Fischer and Stuber (2012) opposed the point of view of previous scholar. The author in this specific context has stated that only good communication between the employees and managers is not sufficient for a call center to render the success of business. Service providers should have to loyalty towards the consumers as well. The service providers should treat every single consumer with equal respect and dignity (Sayer 2012). O therwise, the number of target customers would not be enhanced. Therefore, the concept of Taylorism would not be effective for running a call center properly. As per the video clips, the history of Taylorism has already been happened 100 years ago. Therefore, as per the present business scenario the situation is different. Business organizations have to follow internal and external strategies in order to compete with its contemporaries. At the same time it is undeniable that the overall concept of Taylorism rendered immense motivation on the mind of employees (Pitsoe and Letseka 2013). Employee co-operation, better remuneration package, maintaining organizational culture and discipline is highly important for every business organization to become successful. Therefore, Taylorism in the business industry has still remained acceptable and appreciable for the recognizable business organizations such as Ford. Pankaj Ghemewat In the second video clip, one of the most recognizable Indian economists Pankaj Ghemewat has provided own opinion about the concept of globalization. This specific individual has suggested feeling the taste of World rather than a specific place. The entire World is endowed with large number of people belonging to different cultural backgrounds and attitudes. In order to enhance the knowledge and understanding human being should go beyond a specific culture and geographical boundary (Glatzer 2012). This particular individual in this opinion has opined that the entrance of foreign aid has made the country people poorer. People while dealing with the persons should not make overstatement. In order to lead a successful life every human being should make a balanced life. A particular country is constituted with different cultural attitudes and religious backgrounds. Therefore, the role of an individual is to communicate with the people of different cultures by overcoming all the barriers. Some of the specific obstacles such as linguistic barriers, technological barriers and psychological barriers cause a major hindrance for developing a good communication among the people. Pankaj ghemewat has stated that collective decision and knowledge can be gathered by maintaining an effective relation among all the family members of the organization. The ream of social media such as facebook is wide that can reduce the distance between two individual persons of different cultures (Haynes 2016). Therefore, a particular person by sitting at the drawing room can share necessary knowledge and experience with another by using the platform of social media. However, after evaluating the concept of globalization established by Pankaj ghemewat it could be concluded that globalization is highly important to widen the mental horizon of an individual (Akpor-Robaro 2012). This particular video has provided in-depth overview on how globalization can enhance the mental skill and ability of an i ndividual. After going through the entire point of view of Pankaj ghemewat it can be realized that people in the current scenario are becoming accustomed with globalization. The advancement of technology is leaving a positive impact on every single individual. People belonging to different geographical market can communicate with each other by using advanced technology. Therefore, for these perspectives globalization has a major impact in developing the skill and competency of human being. At the same time, it is undeniable that globalization has rendered people of diverse culture at a workplace together. The implementation of anti discrimination act implies that people belonging to different cultural backgrounds should be treated with equal respect and dignity at the workplace (Gachoka 2015). As a result, the lack of communication and interaction has been raised within various organizations. People of various cultures failed to maintain a proper work life balance. In this kind of situation, th e interpersonal communication between two individual persons gets hampered due to these obstacles. However, after evaluating the point of view of Pankaj ghemewat it cannot be denied that the revolution of globalization has left a major positive impact in enhancing the mental ability of human being. Reference List: Akpor-Robaro, M.O.M., 2012. The impact of globalization on entrepreneurship development in developing economies: A theoretical analysis of the Nigerian experience in the manufacturing industry.Management Science and Engineering,6(2), pp.1-10. Boyer, R. and Durand, J.P., 2016.After fordism. Springer. Fischer, M. and Stuber, F., 2012. Work-Process Knowledge and the.Shop Floor Control-A Systems Perspective: From Deterministic Models towards Agile Operations Management, p.367. Gachoka, H., 2015. Impact of globalization on the human resource management function in developing countries: a case study of kenya public corporations. Glatzer, W., 2012. Cross-national comparisons of quality of life in developed nations, including the impact of globalization. InHandbook of social indicators and quality of life research(pp. 381-398). Springer Netherlands. Haynes, J. ed., 2016.Religion, globalization and political culture in the Third World. Springer. Pitsoe, V. and Letseka, M., 2013. Foucaults discourse and power: Implications for instructionist classroom management.Open Journal of Philosophy,3(01), p.23. Sayer, A., 2012. Capabilities, contributive injustice and unequal divisions of labour.Journal of Human Development and Capabilities,13(4), pp.580-596.